subject_line
EVALUATION PROCESS SURVEY
Meet Location (City, State)
*
Meet Dates (XXX XX-XX, XXXX)
*
Name of person who performed your evaluation
*
Position/Level Being Evaluated:
*
N2 Admin Official
N2 Stroke & Turn
N2 Chief Judge
N2 Starter
N2 Referee
N2 Admin Referee
N3 Stroke & Turn
N3 Chief Judge-Initial
N3 Chief Judge-Final
N3 Starter-Initial
N3 Starter-Final
N3 Referee-Initial
N3 Referee-Final
N3 Admin Referee-Initial
N3 Admin Referee-Final
1. Before the meet began, did you complete and submit a Request for Evaluation form?
*
Yes
No
2. Before the meet began, did you receive a copy, or a link to a copy, of the Professional Document for the position you were being mentored?
*
Yes
No
3. Did you have an opportunity to discuss basic position protocols, procedures and performance standards with your mentor prior to the start of the meet or the period when you began filling that role?
*
Yes
No
4. Once the meet and mentoring began, in what specific areas were you told you were performing well?
5. What specific suggestions or tips were you provided to improve your performance or skills?
6. At what point during the meet did you have an opportunity to implement any of the tips during this meet? Example: beginning of your sessions in the position; middle of your assigned sessions; towards the end, etc. Please provide details.
7. What did you discuss about your overall evaluation with your mentor and at what point during the meet did that discussion take place?
8. What did you learn about the N2/N3 certification process that you didn't know before?
9. Overall, what would you say were the most beneficial aspects of the mentoring/evaluation process?
10. Were there any negative aspects of the mentoring/evaluation process that you would like to see addressed for the future?
11. Is there anything else you would like to suggest for improving the mentoring/evaluation process and/or the National Certification program?
Once again, thank you for taking the time to participate in our survey!